Online Practice Manuals

Pacific National Investments Ltd. v. Victoria (City)

• 2003 BCCA 162
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 2004 SCC 75
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. British Columbia Business Disputes (Current to: August 01 2016)
   • Chapter 3. Unjust Enrichment
     • II. Characteristics of “Autonomous” Unjust Enrichment [§3.2]
       • A. An Equitable Cause of Action Not Founded in Equity [§3.3]
       • B. Liability Independent of Contract, Tort, or the Assertion of Property Rights [§3.4]
     • III. The Three Elements [§3.10]
       • A. Enrichment of the Defendant [§3.11]
         • 1. Valuing Non-monetary Enrichments—The Problem of “Subjective Devaluation” [§3.12]
       • C. Absence of Juristic Reason [§3.20]
         • 3. Garland v. Consumers’ Gas Formula [§3.23]
     • IV. Unjust Enrichment in a Contractual Context [§3.27]
       • A. The Fundamental Rule: Contractual Allocations of Benefits and Burdens Should Not Be Disturbed [§3.28]
   • Chapter 14. Damages and Other Remedies
     • X. Equitable Remedies [§14.54]
       • A. Restitution [§14.55]
         • 1. Restitution and Unjust Enrichment [§14.56]