Online Practice Manuals

Vancouver Community College v. Phillips, Barratt

• 1987 CanLII 2532 (BC SC)
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. Expert Evidence in British Columbia Civil Proceedings (Current to: July 01 2021)
   • Chapter 2. What Is an Expert?
     • II. The Expert as Witness, Advisor, or Both? [§2.2]
       • B. The Expert as a Witness [§2.4]
       • C. The Expert in Dual Roles [§2.5]
         • 1. Privilege and the Testifying Expert [§2.6]
     • III. Limits on Expert Testimony [§2.8]
       • F. An Expert May Not Offer Argument Disguised as Opinion [§2.14]
   • Chapter 4. Expert Opinions and Ethical and Professional Responsibility Issues
     • II. British Columbia’s Approach to Expert Evidence [§4.2]
       • A. Common Law Origins [§4.3]
       • B. Supreme Court Civil Rules 11-2 and 11-6 [§4.4]
     • III. Specific Ethical and Professional Responsibility Issues [§4.5]
       • B. Counsel’s Engagement with the Expert [§4.7]
       • E. Maintenance and Possible Production of the Expert Opinion File [§4.10]
       • F. Possible Discovery of Documents and People Relating to Expert Witnesses [§4.11]
     • IV. Summary and Conclusions on Ethical and Professional Responsibility Issues [§4.12]
   • Chapter 8. Attacking Expert Evidence
     • VI. Challenging Expert Evidence through Other Avenues of Attack [§8.20]
       • E. Challenging the Consistency of the Opinion [§8.35]