Blue Line Hockey Acquisition Co. v. Orca Bay Hockey Limited Partnership
- 2007 BCSC 143
- Go to CanLII for full text
- 2007 BCSC 577
- Go to CanLII for full text
- 2008 BCSC 27
- Go to CanLII for full text
- 2009 BCCA 34
- Go to CanLII for full text
- 2009 CanLII 38635 (SCC)
- Go to CanLII for full text
The above case is referenced within:
-
British Columbia Business Disputes
(Current to: August 01 2016)
-
Chapter 2. Fiduciary Duty
-
II. The Basic Framework [§2.2]
- A. The Fiduciary Concept [§2.3]
- D. Related Bases of Liability [§2.6]
-
III. Fiduciary Relationships [§2.13]
- C. Ad Hoc or Fact-specific Fiduciary Relationships [§2.16]
- IV. Fiduciary Obligations [§2.19]
-
II. The Basic Framework [§2.2]
-
Chapter 2. Fiduciary Duty
-
Civil Appeal Handbook
(Current to: January 01 2023)
-
Chapter 2. Standards of Review
-
VII. Standard of Review Analysis: Specific Cases [§2.7]
- K. Business Disputes [§2.26]
-
VII. Standard of Review Analysis: Specific Cases [§2.7]
-
Chapter 2. Standards of Review
-
Discovery Practice in British Columbia
(Current to: January 15 2024)
-
Chapter 3. Examination for Discovery
-
XIII. Conducting the Examination for Discovery [§3.92]
-
B. Examination Style and Questioning Techniques [§3.100]
- 4. Types of Questions to Avoid: Impropriety and Ambiguity [§3.109]
-
B. Examination Style and Questioning Techniques [§3.100]
-
XIII. Conducting the Examination for Discovery [§3.92]
-
Chapter 3. Examination for Discovery
-
Introducing Evidence at Trial: A British Columbia Handbook
(Current to: September 01 2020)
-
Chapter 16. Privilege as an Evidentiary Rule
-
II. Is (or Was) the Evidence Privileged? [§16.2]
- B. Settlement Negotiation Privilege and “Without Prejudice” Communication [§16.9]
-
II. Is (or Was) the Evidence Privileged? [§16.2]
-
Chapter 16. Privilege as an Evidentiary Rule