Online Practice Manuals

R. v. U. (F.J.)

• 1994 CanLII 1085 (ON CA)
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 1995 CanLII 74 (SCC)
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 1994 CanLII 1085 (ON CA)
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. Canadian Criminal Jury Instructions (Current to: August 24 2023)
   • Chapter 54. Prior Inconsistent Statement of a Witness—Cross-Examination—CRIMJI 4.77
     • IX. Prior Statements of an Accused and a Complainant—Comparison [§54.9]
2. Civil Jury Instructions (Current to: November 01 2023)
   • Chapter 18. Evaluation of the Evidence—Prior Contradictory Statement of a Witness—CIVJI 4.12
     • III. Where Prior Inconsistent Statement Is Admissible for the Truth of Its Contents [§18.9]
3. Introducing Evidence at Trial: A British Columbia Handbook (Current to: September 01 2020)
   • Chapter 3. Adverse or Hostile Witnesses
     • III. The Adverse Witness in Criminal Trials [§3.6]
       • A. Application to Cross-examine on a Prior Inconsistent Statement [§3.7]
       • C. Prior Statement Admitted for Truth of its Contents [§3.9]
   • Chapter 10. Hearsay Evidence
     • IV. The Principled Approach to Hearsay [§10.19]
       • B. Reliability of the Hearsay [§10.31]
         • 2. Differing Modes of Analysis under Principled Approach to Hearsay [§10.33]
         • 4. Substantive Reliability [§10.35]
         • 5. Checklist of Considerations on Threshold Reliability [§10.36]