Online Practice Manuals

Moore v. Getahun

• 2014 ONSC 237
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 2015 ONCA 55
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 2015 CanLII 58374 (SCC)
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. Expert Evidence in British Columbia Civil Proceedings (Current to: July 01 2021)
   • Chapter 1. Expert Evidence in the Context of the Law of Evidence at Large
     • III. Admissibility of Expert Evidence [§1.15]
       • E. Expert Must Be Properly Qualified [§1.24]
   • Chapter 4. Expert Opinions and Ethical and Professional Responsibility Issues
     • III. Specific Ethical and Professional Responsibility Issues [§4.5]
       • A. Expert, Not Advocate, for Any Party [§4.6]
       • B. Counsel’s Engagement with the Expert [§4.7]
       • F. Possible Discovery of Documents and People Relating to Expert Witnesses [§4.11]
     • IV. Summary and Conclusions on Ethical and Professional Responsibility Issues [§4.12]
   • Chapter 6. Pre-trial Disclosure of Expert Opinions and Related Matters
     • I. Written Reports of Expert Opinion [§6.1]
       • C. Content of the Expert Report [§6.4]
         • 6. Form of the Expert Opinion [§6.10]
   • Chapter 8. Attacking Expert Evidence
     • VI. Challenging Expert Evidence through Other Avenues of Attack [§8.20]
       • D. Challenging the Expert’s Objectivity [§8.32]
         • 2. Witness Bias [§8.34]
2. Introducing Evidence at Trial: A British Columbia Handbook (Current to: September 01 2020)
   • Chapter 13. Opinion Evidence
     • II. Admissibility of Expert Opinion Evidence [§13.2]
       • F. Challenging Expert Evidence [§13.16]
         • 1. Preparation [§13.17]