Online Practice Manuals

Hellberg v. Netherclift

• 2017 BCSC 738
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 2017 BCCA 363
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 2018 BCSC 357
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 2018 BCSC 357
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 2018 BCCA 404
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 2019 BCCA 24
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. British Columbia Family Practice Manual (Current to: February 01 2023)
   • Chapter 11. Using Alternatives to Trial in a Family Law Case
     • I. Summary Trial in Family Law Proceedings [§11.1]
       • A. Appropriateness of Summary Trial Procedure [§11.2]
         • 4. Nature of the Issues [§11.6]
2. Family Law Sourcebook for British Columbia (Current to: October 15 2023)
   • Chapter 2. Parenting and Care of Children
     • III. Custody and Access under the Pre-amendments Divorce Act [§2.8]
       • B. The Meaning of Joint Custody [§2.10]
     • XI. Parental Mobility and Relocation [§2.51]
       • A. Relocation under the Divorce Act [§2.52]
         • 1. Best Interests of the Child Generally (Sections 16 and 16.92) [§2.53]
         • 2. Section 16.92(1) (a) —The Reasons for Relocation [§2.54]
         • 3. Section 16.92(1) (b) —Impact of Relocation on the Child [§2.55]
         • 4. Section 16.92(1) (c) —Amount of Time Spent and Level of Involvement of Each Parent [§2.56]
         • 7. Section 16(6) —Maximizing Contact Between the Child and Both Parents [§2.59]
   • Chapter 11. Procedural Alternatives in Family Law
     • II. Procedural Alternatives in Supreme Court [§11.14]
       • D. Summary Trials in Family Law Cases [§11.18]
         • 2. Appropriateness of the Summary Trial Procedure in Family Law Cases [§11.20]
           • b. Relocation and Children [§11.22]