Online Practice Manuals

United States of America v. Yemec

• 2003 CanLII 23436 (ON SC)
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 2004 CanLII 25211 (ON CA)
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 2005 CanLII 8709 (ON SCDC)
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 2009 CanLII 44418 (ON SC)
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. British Columbia Creditors’ Remedies: An Annotated Guide (Current to: July 01 2022)
   • Chapter 4. Injunctions and Preservation Orders
     • II. Mareva Injunctions (Orders for Preservation of Assets) [§4.2]
       • G. Evidence and Disclosure Required for a Mareva Injunction [§4.9]
       • L. Undertaking as to Damages and Indemnities [§4.14]
       • M. Setting Aside or Varying a Mareva Injunction [§4.15]
2. Injunctions: British Columbia Law and Practice (Current to: April 01 2022)
   • Chapter 2. Mareva, Preservation, and Anton Piller Orders
     • II. Mareva Injunctions [§2.2]
       • E. Test for a Mareva Injunction in British Columbia [§2.13]
         • 2. The Two-part Test for a Mareva Injunction in British Columbia [§2.15]
           • a. The “Strong Prima Facie Case” Test for a Mareva Injunction in British Columbia [§2.16]
       • G. Evidence and Disclosure Required for a Mareva Injunction [§2.20]
         • 3. Full and Frank Disclosure [§2.23]
       • L. Undertaking as to Damages and Indemnities [§2.33]
       • M. Setting Aside or Varying a Mareva Injunction [§2.34]