Online Practice Manuals

Brough v. Richmond

• 2003 BCSC 512
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. Expert Evidence in British Columbia Civil Proceedings (Current to: July 01 2021)
   • Chapter 2. What Is an Expert?
     • IV. The Ultimate Issue Rule [§2.17]
       • B. The Ultimate Issue Rule Impugned [§2.19]
         • 1. Ultimate Issue or Unnecessary Evidence? [§2.20]
   • Chapter 4. Expert Opinions and Ethical and Professional Responsibility Issues
     • III. Specific Ethical and Professional Responsibility Issues [§4.5]
       • A. Expert, Not Advocate, for Any Party [§4.6]
   • Chapter 8. Attacking Expert Evidence
     • III. Challenging the Expert’s Qualifications [§8.7]
       • E. Scope of Expertise [§8.12]
         • 4. Proffered Opinion Directed at the Credibility of a Witness [§8.16]
     • VI. Challenging Expert Evidence through Other Avenues of Attack [§8.20]
       • A. Challenging Facts on Which the Opinion Is Based [§8.21]
         • 1. Expert’s Inferences [§8.22]
           • b. Factual Inferences [§8.24]
       • G. Challenging the Opinion as Offending the Ultimate Issue Rule [§8.37]
       • H. Challenging the Expert Opinion as Argument Disguised as Evidence [§8.38]
2. Provincial Court Small Claims Handbook (Current to: July 15 2023)
   • Chapter 6. Trial Preparation in Small Claims Provincial Court
     • III. Witnesses at Trial [§6.5]
       • C. Expert Witnesses [§6.12]
         • 1. Preparing Expert Evidence [§6.13]