Online Practice Manuals

Lavallee, Rackel & Heintz v. Canada (Attorney General); White, Ottenheimer & Baker v. Canada (Attorney General); R. v. Fink

• 2002 SCC 61
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. Expert Evidence in British Columbia Civil Proceedings (Current to: July 01 2021)
   • Chapter 1. Expert Evidence in the Context of the Law of Evidence at Large
     • I. Overview of the Law of Evidence [§1.1]
       • A. Evidence in an Adversarial System of Trial [§1.2]
2. Introducing Evidence at Trial: A British Columbia Handbook (Current to: September 01 2020)
   • Chapter 1. The Basic Concepts of the Law of Evidence
     • V. Consider Exclusionary Rules of Evidence [§1.5]
       • C. Privilege [§1.8]
   • Chapter 16. Privilege as an Evidentiary Rule
     • II. Is (or Was) the Evidence Privileged? [§16.2]
       • A. Privilege Involving Lawyers and Litigation [§16.3]
         • 1. Confidential Communications between Solicitor and Client: Solicitor-client Privilege [§16.4]
           • c. “Legal Advice” in the Solicitor-client Relationship [§16.7]