Online Practice Manuals

R. v. Parrott

• 2001 SCC 3
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. Expert Evidence in British Columbia Civil Proceedings (Current to: July 01 2021)
   • Chapter 1. Expert Evidence in the Context of the Law of Evidence at Large
     • III. Admissibility of Expert Evidence [§1.15]
       • C. Evidence Must Be Necessary to Assist the Trier of Fact [§1.18]
   • Chapter 3. Choosing an Expert
     • II. The Expert’s Qualifications [§3.2]
       • A. Who Is an Expert? [§3.3]
   • Chapter 8. Attacking Expert Evidence
     • III. Challenging the Expert’s Qualifications [§8.7]
       • E. Scope of Expertise [§8.12]
         • 5. Proffered Opinion Directed at the Competence of a Witness [§8.17]
2. Introducing Evidence at Trial: A British Columbia Handbook (Current to: September 01 2024)
   • Chapter 12. Hearsay Evidence
     • IV. The Principled Approach to Hearsay [§12.19]
       • A. Necessity of the Hearsay [§12.20]
         • 1. Unavailability of the Declarant [§12.21]
           • e. The Declarant Is Not Competent to Give Evidence [§12.26]