Online Practice Manuals

Quintette Coal Ltd. v. Bow Valley Resource Services Ltd.

• 1988 CanLII 2914 (BC SC)
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. Expert Evidence in British Columbia Civil Proceedings (Current to: July 01 2021)
   • Chapter 2. What Is an Expert?
     • III. Limits on Expert Testimony [§2.8]
       • B. An Expert May Not Make Express Conclusions of Law [§2.10]
       • D. An Expert May Not Make Findings of Fact [§2.12]
       • F. An Expert May Not Offer Argument Disguised as Opinion [§2.14]
     • IV. The Ultimate Issue Rule [§2.17]
       • A. Avoiding Usurpation of the Court’s Function [§2.18]
   • Chapter 6. Pre-trial Disclosure of Expert Opinions and Related Matters
     • I. Written Reports of Expert Opinion [§6.1]
       • C. Content of the Expert Report [§6.4]
         • 3. Facts and Assumptions in the Expert Report [§6.7]
   • Chapter 8. Attacking Expert Evidence
     • VI. Challenging Expert Evidence through Other Avenues of Attack [§8.20]
       • A. Challenging Facts on Which the Opinion Is Based [§8.21]
         • 1. Expert’s Inferences [§8.22]
           • a. Facts on Which the Opinion Is Based [§8.23]
       • I. Challenging the Opinion as Making Findings of Fact [§8.39]
       • L. Challenging the Opinion as Making Conclusions of Law [§8.42]
     • VII. The Court’s Response to the Expert Opinion [§8.44]
       • B. Inadmissible Content in the Opinion [§8.46]
         • 2. Mixed Admissible and Inadmissible Opinion [§8.48]
2. Introducing Evidence at Trial: A British Columbia Handbook (Current to: September 01 2020)
   • Chapter 13. Opinion Evidence
     • II. Admissibility of Expert Opinion Evidence [§13.2]
       • E. Introducing an Expert Opinion at Trial [§13.10]
         • 5. The Expert Opinion [§13.15]