Online Practice Manuals

Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada

• [1992] 3 SCR 762, 1992 CanLII 21 (SCC)
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. British Columbia Business Disputes (Current to: August 01 2016)
   • Chapter 3. Unjust Enrichment
     • II. Characteristics of “Autonomous” Unjust Enrichment [§3.2]
       • A. An Equitable Cause of Action Not Founded in Equity [§3.3]
     • III. The Three Elements [§3.10]
       • A. Enrichment of the Defendant [§3.11]
         • 2. The Test of Incontrovertible Benefit [§3.13]
         • 3. Alternative Test [§3.14]
       • C. Absence of Juristic Reason [§3.20]
         • 3. Garland v. Consumers’ Gas Formula [§3.23]
     • V. Defences [§3.34]
       • A. Change of Position [§3.35]