R. v. Arp
- 1998 CanLII 769 (SCC)
- Go to CanLII for full text
The above case is referenced within:
-
Canadian Criminal Jury Instructions
(Current to: August 24 2023)
- Chapter 8. Similar Facts—Preliminary Warning—CRIMJI 2.03
- Chapter 46. Similar Facts—Previous Acts—CRIMJI 4.60
-
Civil Jury Instructions
(Current to: November 01 2023)
- Chapter 14. Instructions Usually Given in Every Trial—Direct and Circumstantial Evidence—CIVJI 4.08
-
Introducing Evidence at Trial: A British Columbia Handbook
(Current to: September 01 2020)
- Chapter 1. The Basic Concepts of the Law of Evidence
-
Chapter 14. Post-occurrence or Post-offence Conduct Evidence
-
III. Evidence of Post-offence Conduct in Criminal Trials [§14.6]
- C. Principles of Admissibility of After-the-fact Conduct [§14.9]
-
III. Evidence of Post-offence Conduct in Criminal Trials [§14.6]
-
Chapter 19. Similar Fact Evidence
- I. What Is Similar Fact Evidence? [§19.1]
- II. Purpose of Similar Fact Evidence [§19.2]
- III. Test for Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence [§19.3]
-
B. Assessment of Probative Value of Similar Fact Evidence [§19.5]
- 2. Identify the Connection between the Evidence and the Alleged Conduct [§19.7]
-
B. Assessment of Probative Value of Similar Fact Evidence [§19.5]
-
IV. Specific Issues on Some Types of Similar Fact Evidence [§19.19]
- A. Similar Fact Evidence to Prove Identity [§19.20]
- B. Similar Fact Evidence to Identify Groups and to Prove the Identity of Group Members [§19.21]
- VI. Opposing Similar Fact Evidence and Applying for Severance of Counts [§19.28]
- VIII. Use of Similar Fact Evidence by the Jury [§19.32]
-
Chapter 30. Character Evidence
-
III. Evidence of the Accused’s Bad Character in Criminal Trials [§30.8]
- B. Evidence of the Accused’s Bad Character Is Admissible in Exceptional Circumstances [§30.10]
-
III. Evidence of the Accused’s Bad Character in Criminal Trials [§30.8]