R. v. Handy
- 2002 SCC 56
- Go to CanLII for full text
The above case is referenced within:
-
Canadian Criminal Jury Instructions
(Current to: September 01 2024)
- Chapter 8. Similar Facts—Preliminary Warning—CRIMJI 2.03
-
Civil Jury Instructions
(Current to: November 01 2023)
- Chapter 14. Instructions Usually Given in Every Trial—Direct and Circumstantial Evidence—CIVJI 4.08
-
Introducing Evidence at Trial: A British Columbia Handbook
(Current to: September 01 2024)
-
Chapter 1. The Basic Concepts of the Law of Evidence
- VII. Consider the Potential for Prejudice [§1.11]
-
Chapter 6. Character Evidence
- III. Evidence of the Accused’s Bad Character in Criminal Trials [§6.8]
- Chapter 11. Exclusion of Evidence
-
Chapter 22. Similar Fact Evidence
- I. What Is Similar Fact Evidence? [§22.1]
- II. Purpose of Similar Fact Evidence [§22.2]
- III. Test for Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence [§22.3]
- A. Identification of Inferences from Similar Fact Evidence [§22.4]
- B. Assessment of Probative Value of Similar Fact Evidence [§22.5]
- C. Assessment of Prejudicial Effect of Similar Fact Evidence [§22.15]
-
IV. Specific Issues on Some Types of Similar Fact Evidence [§22.19]
- B. Similar Fact Evidence to Identify Groups and to Prove the Identity of Group Members [§22.21]
- IX. Similar Fact Evidence in Civil Proceedings [§22.32]
-
Chapter 1. The Basic Concepts of the Law of Evidence