Online Practice Manuals

Hamelin v. Davis

• 1996 CanLII 3366 (BC CA)
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 1996 CanLII 8356 (BC CA)
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• [1996] S.C.C.A. No. 98 (QL)
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. Civil Appeal Handbook (Current to: January 01 2023)
   • Chapter 6. Hearing and New Matters Arising on Appeal
     • II. New Matters Arising on Appeal [§6.28]
       • A. Fresh or New Evidence on Appeal [§6.29]
         • 4. Palmer’s Due Diligence Criterion [§6.33]
           • a. Due Diligence Requirement [§6.34]
         • 5. The Other Palmer Criterion [§6.37]
           • c. Conclusiveness [§6.40]
         • 7. Fresh or New Evidence in Leave Applications and Interlocutory Appeals [§6.42]
   • Chapter 7. Post-hearing Matters
     • I. Matters Arising after Appeal Hearing [§7.1]
       • B. Application for Rehearing of Appeal [§7.3]