Online Practice Manuals

Deglman v. Guaranty Trust Co. of Canada

• 1954 CanLII 2 (SCC)
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. British Columbia Business Disputes (Current to: August 01 2016)
   • Chapter 3. Unjust Enrichment
     • II. Characteristics of “Autonomous” Unjust Enrichment [§3.2]
       • B. Liability Independent of Contract, Tort, or the Assertion of Property Rights [§3.4]
     • III. The Three Elements [§3.10]
       • A. Enrichment of the Defendant [§3.11]
         • 1. Valuing Non-monetary Enrichments—The Problem of “Subjective Devaluation” [§3.12]
     • IV. Unjust Enrichment in a Contractual Context [§3.27]
       • B. Illegal Contract [§3.29]
   • Chapter 14. Damages and Other Remedies
     • X. Equitable Remedies [§14.54]
       • A. Restitution [§14.55]
         • 1. Restitution and Unjust Enrichment [§14.56]
           • a. Restitution without Wrongdoing [§14.57]
       • B. Constructive Trusts [§14.59]
         • 2. In What Circumstances Can or Should a Constructive Trust Be Declared or Imposed? [§14.61]
           • b. Family Cases [§14.63]
2. Estate Disputes in British Columbia: A Litigator’s Guide (Current to: January 15 2024)
   • Chapter 15. Resulting Trusts, Unjust Enrichment, Constructive Trusts, and Secret Trusts
     • III. Unjust Enrichment [§15.21]
       • C. Remedies in Unjust Enrichment Claims [§15.29]
         • 3. Quantifying the Remedy in Unjust Enrichment Claims [§15.32]
           • b. Quantifying Unjust Enrichment: Quantum Meruit [§15.34]