Online Practice Manuals

R. v. Calnen

• 2019 SCC 6
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. Canadian Criminal Jury Instructions (Current to: September 01 2025)
   • Chapter 28. After the Fact Conduct—CRIMJI 4.21
     • I. Introduction [§28.1]
     • II. Evidence of After the Fact Conduct Has No Probative Value [§28.2]
2. Civil Appeal Handbook (Current to: February 01 2025)
   • Chapter 2. Standards of Review
     • VIII. Standard of Review Analysis: Specific Cases [§2.8]
       • Y. Trial Proceedings [§2.64]
         • 8. Inferences of Fact [§2.72]
3. Introducing Evidence at Trial: A British Columbia Handbook (Current to: September 01 2024)
   • Chapter 17. Post-occurrence or Post-offence Conduct Evidence
     • III. Evidence of Post-offence Conduct in Criminal Trials [§17.5]
       • A. What Is Post-offence Conduct? [§17.6]
       • B. Examples of After-the-fact Conduct Evidence [§17.7]
       • C. Principles of Admissibility of After-the-fact Conduct [§17.8]
         • 1. Probative Value [§17.9]
       • D. Using After-the-fact Conduct Evidence [§17.10]
         • 1. Inferring Intent and Distinguishing between Levels of Culpability and Jury Instructions [§17.11]
       • E. The Importance of Confining After-the-fact Conduct to Its Intended Use [§17.16]