Online Practice Manuals

R. v. Calnen

• 2019 SCC 6
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. Canadian Criminal Jury Instructions (Current to: September 01 2024)
   • Chapter 28. After the Fact Conduct—CRIMJI 4.21
     • I. Introduction [§28.1]
     • II. Evidence of After the Fact Conduct Has No Probative Value [§28.2]
2. Civil Appeal Handbook (Current to: January 01 2023)
   • Chapter 2. Standards of Review
     • VII. Standard of Review Analysis: Specific Cases [§2.7]
       • X. Trial Proceedings [§2.62]
         • 8. Inferences of Fact [§2.70]
3. Introducing Evidence at Trial: A British Columbia Handbook (Current to: September 01 2020)
   • Chapter 14. Post-occurrence or Post-offence Conduct Evidence
     • III. Evidence of Post-offence Conduct in Criminal Trials [§14.6]
       • A. What Is Post-offence Conduct? [§14.7]
       • B. Examples of After-the-fact Conduct Evidence [§14.8]
       • C. Principles of Admissibility of After-the-fact Conduct [§14.9]
         • 1. Probative Value [§14.10]
       • D. Using After-the-fact Conduct Evidence [§14.11]
         • 1. Inferring Intent and Distinguishing between Levels of Culpability and Jury Instructions [§14.12]
       • E. The Importance of Confining After-the-fact Conduct to Its Intended Use [§14.16]