Online Practice Manuals

Perron v. Catalano

• 2016 BCSC 1285 (Master)
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. Plus TC&D: The Assessment of Costs and Disbursements in Motor Vehicle Injury Litigation (Current to: June 01 2022)
   • Chapter 2. Costs Assessments in Motor Vehicle Actions
     • II. Principles Governing the Assessment of Costs in Supreme Court [§2.2]
       • D. Specific Items under the Tariff [§2.13]
         • 2. Item 2—Correspondence, Conferences, Instructions, Investigations or Negotiations by a Party after the Start of the Proceeding to the Completion of the Trial or Hearing, for which Provision Is Not Made Elsewhere in this Tariff [§2.15]
         • 17. Item 17—All Process and Correspondence Associated with Retaining and Consulting all Experts for the Purposes of Obtaining Opinions for Use in the Proceeding [§2.36]
         • 18. Item 18—All Process and Correspondence Associated with Contacting, Interviewing and Issuing Subpoenas to All Witnesses [§2.37]
         • 32. Item 32—Attendance at a Settlement Conference, Case Planning Conference or Trial Management Conference [§2.66]
         • 34. Item 34—Preparation for Trial, if Proceeding Set Down for Each Day of Trial [§2.68]
   • Chapter 3. Disbursements in Motor Vehicle Actions
     • V. Specific Disbursements Awards [§3.5]
       • A. In the Tort Action [§3.6]
         • 11. Experts and Expert Report Fees [§3.20]
           • b. Evidence of Expert Fees Required on Assessment [§3.22]
           • c. Duplication–Experts with Same or Similar Specialty [§3.23]
           • d. Duplication—Multiple Reports from Same Expert [§3.24]
           • e. Inadmissible or Unhelpful Expert Report or Opinion [§3.25]
           • i. Privileged or Undisclosed Expert Report [§3.29]
           • k. Expert’s Cancellation Fees [§3.31]
         • 19. Investigations [§3.39]
         • 26. MRI [§3.46]
           • c. Reasonableness of the MRI [§3.49]