Online Practice Manuals

LaPrairie Crane (Alberta) Ltd. v. Triton Projects Inc.

• 2012 BCSC 1594 (Master)
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. British Columbia Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Practice Manual (Current to: February 01 2024)
   • Chapter 4. Discovery
     • III. Examination for Discovery in a Civil Action [§4.57]
       • H. Scope of the Examination for Discovery [§4.77]
         • 1. “Relating to a Matter in Question in the Action”: The Question of Relevance [§4.78]
2. Discovery Practice in British Columbia (Current to: January 15 2024)
   • Chapter 2. Document Discovery
     • III. Document Discovery from Parties [§2.52]
       • F. Attacking Adequacy of Another Party’s Document Discovery [§2.61]
         • 1. Applying for an Amended List of Documents under Rule 7-1 and Applying under Rule 7-1(10) for Additional Documents [§2.62]
         • 2. Applying for an Amended List of Documents under Rule 7-1(11) that “Relate to Any or All Matters in Question in the Action” [§2.63]
   • Chapter 3. Examination for Discovery
     • XII. What Matters May Be Examined in a Discovery [§3.64]
       • B. Questions That May and May Not Be Asked on an Examination for Discovery [§3.69]
         • 1. Questions Relating to Documents [§3.70]
     • XVI. After the Examination for Discovery [§3.175]
       • A. Application for an Order That a Question Be Answered [§3.176]
       • B. Requests for Further Information Following Examination for Discovery [§3.177]