Online Practice Manuals

R. v. White

• 1996 CanLII 3013 (ON CA)
  • Go to CanLII for full text
• 1998 CanLII 789 (SCC)
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. Canadian Criminal Jury Instructions (Current to: September 01 2025)
   • Chapter 28. After the Fact Conduct—CRIMJI 4.21
     • I. Introduction [§28.1]
     • II. Evidence of After the Fact Conduct Has No Probative Value [§28.2]
     • IV. Accused’s Explanation or Admission—Issue of Guilt [§28.4]
     • VI. Accused’s Admission or Explanation—Issue Other Than Guilt [§28.8]
     • VII. Evidence of the Accused’s After the Fact Conduct Should Be Considered with All the Other Evidence—Caution [§28.9]
     • VIII. Conflict as to Whether the Accused’s After the Fact Conduct Relates to the Crime Charged or to Some Other Blameworthy Act [§28.10]
     • IX. Special Direction—After the Fact Conduct the Only Crown Evidence—Two Possible Interpretations [§28.11]
   • Chapter 66. Motive and Opportunity—Accused—CRIMJI 4.95
     • VIII. Absence of Motive May Support Acquittal [§66.8]
   • Chapter 96. Murder—First Degree (s. 231) —CRIMJI 6.42
     • IV. Section 231(5) [§96.15]
       • B. Section 231(5) —Substantial Cause Test [§96.17]
2. Introducing Evidence at Trial: A British Columbia Handbook (Current to: September 01 2024)
   • Chapter 17. Post-occurrence or Post-offence Conduct Evidence
     • III. Evidence of Post-offence Conduct in Criminal Trials [§17.5]
       • A. What Is Post-offence Conduct? [§17.6]
       • B. Examples of After-the-fact Conduct Evidence [§17.7]
       • D. Using After-the-fact Conduct Evidence [§17.10]
         • 1. Inferring Intent and Distinguishing between Levels of Culpability and Jury Instructions [§17.11]
       • E. The Importance of Confining After-the-fact Conduct to Its Intended Use [§17.16]
       • F. Dangers Associated with After-the-fact Conduct [§17.17]
       • G. Burden of Proof and After-the-fact Conduct Evidence [§17.18]