Online Practice Manuals

Day v. Hume

• 2009 BCSC 587 (Chambers)
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. Discovery Practice in British Columbia (Current to: January 15 2026)
   • Chapter 3. Examination for Discovery
     • XII. What Matters May Be Examined in a Discovery [§3.65]
       • A. General Principles Guiding the Scope of Examinations for Discovery [§3.66]
         • 1. “Relating to a Matter in Question in the Action”: The Question of Relevance [§3.67]
     • XIII. Conducting the Examination for Discovery [§3.93]
       • C. Handling Objections [§3.120]
     • XIV. Defending the Examination for Discovery [§3.123]
       • C. Counsel’s Conduct and Demeanour During the Examination for Discovery [§3.132]
         • 1. Advocacy in Defending the Examination for Discovery: Discussion, Interjecting, and Making Objections [§3.133]
       • D. Making Objections at the Examination for Discovery [§3.136]
         • 2. No Court Preconditions on Defending Counsel’s Right to Object [§3.138]
         • 4. Types of Unsustainable Objections [§3.161]
           • e. Statements “For the Record” and “Laying the Foundation” [§3.166]
       • E. Talking to the Witness During Examination for Discovery [§3.169]